Fai said:
Sun cross is not "christian" symbol. Its a deep pagan symbol found all over the world. And it also has roots in budhism too since it represents the circle of life, reincarnation, etc. Its symbol that is a foundation of budhism(major religion in japan), as well as paganism and Kubo is known to research stuff like that.
Those symbols have strong meanings in japan and both swastika and sun cross have less meaning for western part of the world, actually, hence the misunderstanding or inability to comprehend why they are there.
Even the idea of soul pantheism seems strange to westerners, while it has been the core foundation of shinto religion since beginning of time.
LoL, u like preaching, don't you? Well, I was saying the same thing, but still ...
(
ElMorty said:
LoL, all these westerns asking a Japanese who's been drawing comics for Japan's youth not to use one of their religious symbols (their=Japenese) because over here it has a meaning that in Japan is not even that relevant ... that's globalization mixed with ignorance! ^^)
Fai said:
ElMorty said:
Again, saying that a technique is so powerful because you can pull it off just once in your life and and lose your fighting ability after that, and then making it easy to use a second time after less than 40 chaps is quite lame ....
Its so powerful, but its imperfect. Its a shortcut, just like Quincy's "final form" which was also incomplete(only one wing). I bet that before the end of manga both Ishida(angel-like design) and Ichigo(demon/reaper like design) will have gained the complete final forms that do not involve loosing powers
That's not the point: inventing a "form" or a "skill" or whatever you wish to call "dangai ichigo", so incredibly stronger than anything else that's ever been shown, justifying such a superiority with an high price to use it is definitely LAME, if this price is something you can so easily evade!
It's not a double-edeged sword, it's a tommy-gun!
And I don't remember anybody talking about Dangai ichigo's incompleteness ...
fai said:
There's no bad or good. Gray morality reigns in this manga, with exceptions of characters like Mayuri and Szayel. Everyone has good and bad sides and soul society captains and etc are not "bad people" they are just very conservative, quite good people, placed in positions of power in a conservative authoritarian regime. A lot of nazi soldiers also were generally good people at the wrong places. Its not the people its the regime itself to blame.
LoL abiding Godwin's Law!
And no, as H. Arendt shows in "A Report on the Banality of Evil", nazi officiers weren't just "good guys at wrong places", they were the product of a massive campaign of hate, and are guilty in front of the human race because their conscience failed, making themselves think that what they were doing in the internment was something normal, not a crime at all.
Getting back IT,
Fai said:
No one is "bad guy" or "good guy". Thats just point of viewSS are conservatives. They have laws and principles. If Ichigo did something against those laws and principles that makes him a "badguy" in their eyes and them "badguys" in our eyes but in the end neither ichigo nor the gotei 13 are the badguys.
I don't agree about the part in bold.... They are not the badguy in my eyes, nor I think they should be so in anybody else's eyes ... if Ichigo has done something against their laws they have the right to make him pay! SS has an important role: dealing with dead souls and protecting the living from the dead (hollow). Ichigo can't go fighting (and defeating, since he's the main chara, the hero) everybody just for defending himself. It's not shonen-esque.
A shonen hero would either run away (see also D.Gray Man, where grey moral actually is applied), or do something to prove his innocence (e.g. that Ichigo had to save his friends etc) ... Or in battle manga typically a biggest evil comes in, and fighting all together against third parties, the hero and the rest of the world are reconciled (see also Soul Society Arc).
Fai said:
ElMorty said:
It's not only the means: is the direction towards he is willing to lead the present situation by the change he represents: one where only the strongest are worth of surviving. This is the perfect portrait of the average bad guys in shonen mangas ... I really don't see how his principles could be right!
His principles were the logic of shonen hero - one should not give up and use all his strength to right the wrongs he percieves. in a sense, Aizen is Ichigo who has strayed away from his path.
Aizen killing Harribel at the end of Karakura arc puts him at the top of any hypothetical "moral badassery scale of shonen evil charas", abiding the well known format "X kills his companion Y without any damn reason".
Same said for Aizen killing captain No1likesu.