- #82
Fai said:
RingoPie said:
I'm gonna mention popular titles like OP, Naruto, Bakuman, Beelzebub etc all had 10x pacing in a chapter than Kubo... Do they drop in quality? Nope! Kubo just draws every little pointless scene, he's just stretching the manga out, when it's not needed... He's just killing it...
LOL. You mean the manga that had 300 chapter "War" arc which consisted of one overpowered character reviving dozens of dead fodder again and again, main people defeating them with LOVE and then NEXT CHALLENGER being resurrected?
Remind me not to take you seriously form now on, will you? ;]
LOL, Did you even read? My point was the content in a single chapterl, Bleach barely has anything in there, Naruto which has been dragging for a long time now has more content in, not many ideas presented but it has MORE DIALOGUE.
You're thinking too much into Bleach. :) The author himself doesn't have any idea what's he writing basically you're giving assumptions a lot better than what the author can give, he's just recycling cliched ideas hoping to milk out this series for another 2 years...
Like I said, don't tell me it had emotional or inspirational scenes or whatever, it's very cliched and have been done loads before in a better way... What we learned in this arc could have been done in nothing more than 10 chapters AT MOST.
But ofc Bleach has an idea behind it... I'll just wait and see if your hopes in Kubo will be right. <_<
This. Mostly, at least.
Fai, I give up. There is no arguing with you. its the third or so time I do it, and I've seen others try, but if there is one internet rule one must no break is: Do not try to change another's opinion when they don't show clear signs of being able to admit they're wrong.
I could insult you right now, but frankly I'd rather not stoop down any lower than I already have. You not only fail to see any of my points, you hide behind false accusations of bad english (I've seen you quote posts with far worse english praising you, you understood those just fine) and shout back opinions on what happened that lack any depth or justification. Heck, the only arguments you spout with any concrete, not misinterpretated info are the ones backed by Kubo's press conferences (importance of Ichigo's birth, Mayuri, that stuff.)
Here's a tad bit of info: a good reviewer does not praise or diminish a work using info gathered from an outside source. If you want to say that what happened in this arc is acceptable, or hell, "good", use info the chapters themselves gave you.
Don't throw fanboy speculations about Soul King (how correct they may or may not be is something I dont dispute) to justify whatever BS failed to happen, or to hide the fact that there was no plot advancement at all in over a year!