- #1
What is this cute ideal? s*aves cannot be treated roughly in bed or their masters will be lawfully punished, s*aves eat on the floor unless their master allows them to eat at the table... many other restrictions are imposed to make this just a vanilla lover's kink. There is consent dripping from every action they do, yes they should enjoy s*x but what master asks his s*ave every time if he can do it? Just go for it! If the s*ave hates it they will tell you! Coward!I wrapped up my rant in a tag since you can skip it, but I want to leave it here for myself.Spoiler
Even the s*ave takes more initiative to be treated s*ave-like and the master 'punishments' are so weak. How is 'having s*x without making a sound' a punishment when even if she makes a sound he just focuses on pleasuring her? This ain't love, he is not in love with her, he's a vanilla sweet bastard who lacks the drive to be a master.
And, this master is so kind and not assertive at all. Why the heck write a s*ave-master smut and not add the s*ave-master associated kinks? The heck, just ask your partner to do this already, stop writing a boring smut with no adventure. These things can be acted with consenting partners, there won't even be repercussions since it's so vanilla.
[collapse]This s*ave has so many human rights... I don't like ab*se but even the punishments are just watching her m*sturbate or a tad rough sex? It's just written in an idealistic way. The author wants to live their s*ave-master kink but is afraid of the unknown and imposed so many 'good-will' restrictions that the only thing 's*ave-master' about this is the certification proving he bought a maid. The kinkiest thing I saw was when the s*ave store owner mentioned some masters like to walk their s*x s*aves back naked... even that was only mentioned and not acted on. Our ML even cringed a little. Disqualified.