Fairy Tail Chapter 299 Discussion
- Thread starter Cam
- Start date
- #5
BlackRain_Ex said:
they should have actual chapters relevant to the story and have the fillers as a special bonus chapter. wasted week.
Oh would you like a two week hiatus then? Because guess what THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS. Mashima was just feeling generous enough to give some bonus material instead of just empty two weeks.
2 weeks of no chapters and spending that time thinking about the actual story so it isn't full of potholes would have been better.
Fai said:
undead_blopa said:
No one actually complains about the side stories being bad thing, in fact I actually like them, but the timing can't be worse. This is not some "nice brake stories", it's just Mashima stalling for chapter 300 to make that "awesome revelation" or something.
Timing is PERFECT.
Timing isnt perfect at all, 3 chapters ago we didn't have an idea that the masked lady existed.
Why make such a big deal out of it by waiting to weeks longer.
The disappointment is only going to be greater.
Fai said:
AceIII said:
Filler in a freaking MANGA.
You heard it here first guys, character development and relationship re-establishments are now labeled fillers.
Did Gildarts character development change during this side story?
Or are we going to see the characters form that village again later?
If i didnt read the side story this week would i have missed something?
Because this is what differentiate cannon from filler.
Fai said:
Maffy said:
how it must have been jealous of Naruto and its silent chapter.
^implying there's something to be jealous about that horrible trainwreck.
Now you're just talking nonsense.
- #9
Normally we only get these kind of brakes right between arcs.And we do seem to be between arcs now too,but since the new arc will probably come right away,there won't be much time for these things.Even so,Mashima gave us these nice brake stories here,so nobody will miss it.There's nothing much different from how FT always worked here,so there's no need to complain.
- #10
2 weeks of no chapters and spending that time thinking about the actual story so it isn't full of potholes would have been better.
blackslash32 said:
I said holes not plot-holes.
Go figure.
blackslash32 said:
And whether you call them plot-holes, holes or whatever, they still stand and made these side stories for me not enjoyable.
It's called "characters" and whatever behaviour and comical relief that entails. But you obviously can't admit that, cuz if you said sth like"I don't like stories dedicated solely on the characters" you would sound too subjective and your post wouldn't matter as an arguement.
blackslash32 said:
And i only said "What? Did Loneliness get to you again that you just had to jump in this?" because he said it to me a few posts earlier.
Yes, you said that even though you were the one butting in, ergo you were butthurt when he first told you that and you ofc felt the need to reply in the most classic way by repeating what he said even though it didn't make any sense at that given momment.
blackslash32 said:
So maybe you should start reading too before trying to break me down.
I'm not trying to break you down pal, I'm trying to show a little bit of reason so that you will stop pretending that you are doing constructive critisim while all you do is reuse some terms(fillers/plot holes) that you once read from somewhere else simply to enhance you point of view.
