RedgraveGilver said:
gilgamesh310 said:
I think the biggest flaw with the whole story is that it's very grounded in realism in one sense but also very unrealistic in others. The pacifism and OTT fights being an example of the latter. Its hard to become properly immersed in its world when it has the unrealistic stuff.
Especially with the part where Canute's sevant(?) suddenly showing up as a ghost then changing his characterization forever. Maybe it's just the psychological aspect of the series. The OTTP fights are already established since the beginning. I mean come on. Carrying a huge fucking boat in land? Fighting with two knives and jumping for like 15 feet in the air? Thorkell sending a horse flying away with an uppercut? This is all just for entertainment if you ask me though.
Most fantasies are grounded in realism in many ways now a days though. The Malazan, Mistborn, Way of the Kings and A Song of Ice and Fire are examples. But then again, Vinland saga isn't really fantasy.
It's more because there is no real character development in the traditional sense where we actually witnessed the change. In Vinland Saga, character development, aside from Askeladd-Thorfinn, relies on instantaneous changes in personality or time skips.
Canutes' change from the reclusive shy boy to the authoritive warband leader happened in a very implausible instantaneous manner, whilst his development into a charismatic, shrewd warrior-prince happened over a time skip.
Thorfinn's crucial development from Norse assassin into pacifistic farmer-thrall occurred over a lazy time skip. Perhaps if I saw what led him to become a slave, and a pacifist from Askeladd's death, I would be more receptive to the change. Instead, we get a lazy before-and-after shot, and because of this, it just seems like Farmland-arc Thorfinn is a new character rather than a maturation of Askeladd-arc Thorfinn.
I will say as someone versed in Icelandic and early Medieval history, his hardcore pacifistic personality is highly irregular for the society and psychology of the time in regards to someone of his status in society. Rather, it seems the mangaka is forcing hardcore Japanese Bushido on a character in the turbulent 11th century Europe (which has VERY different moral codes and beliefs compared to 16th-17th century Japan)