- #42
Darklight0303 said:
Nashi7 said:
Talukita said:
Nashi7 said:
Huh? Isn't the reason why Ultear wants to kill Rouge is for Future Rouge to disappear and it has nothing to do with the Eclipse anymore since it was already opened in the present timeline?
Anyways, my theory on timeline was kinda correct.
The point is killing Rogue does not necessarily make F Rogue disappear, because there are alternate realities and such. The first chart in the chapter clearly explains that there are multiple futures with different results. Think about this way: the present is still the future of the past, combine with the former fact we can get multiple versions of present Rogue as well. So killing Rogue will not matter as there are still an alternate version of him that will become Future Rogue.
Yeah, I know that. But what I'm saying is that killing Rouge has nothing to do with the opening of Eclipse.
If F Rouge is from the future of the "present" timeline, then killing Rouge can make F Rouge disappear (it's like saying that F Rouge is the result of what is happening right now) but if F Rouge came from a timeline which is different from the "present timeline" then killing Rouge will not make F Rouge disappear.
the point is that as long as the eclipse gate exists and is opened in any timeline, killing future Rogue won't save Earthland. The one way to stop this all from happening is destroying the gate before it is opened.
I can understand what and the 3 of you are saying but what is bothering me is that on the timeline we see that FRouge is going back in time but don't show us how he make a deal with the dragons.
If the dragons are from 400 year ago he must go first there and to control and to deal with them.
He never made any deal with them. That's just instructions via his magic. As we saw with Atlas he didn't even know he was being controlled. So the other dragons obey him as if they had made some kind of deal. Dragons have no interest to make a deal with Rogue. They would not want a human to rule THEIR world.
