A Red Rose Devoted to You

That's true, but this one have sh***est conflict, so disappointed Even thought the manga have goddest level drawing skill  

And here I was expecting the outcome since the manga were pretty decent... Japanese.. just, why.??? 

Woaah
What a shitty b!@tch

I'm also close to some of my cousins so i could never even think that someone could say something like that only because we are getting along (ಠ_ಠ)>⌐■-■
She's got some guts to say a baseless shit like that. 

Lol. But if the misunderstanding solved in one chapter, it will become one shot and the author didn't want to do that  

She could have just demanded a divorce in the first place and rid us all the trouble . But I have to agree, although considering the time and setting, the incest undertone still creeps me out. Also the "I'm gay but if it's you I'll be okay" thing with the prince makes me want to flip a table  

I feel personally attacked when I'm just giving spoilers??? Like wtf it's all what happened in the novel ffs I don't even put any personal feelings in it why are you being so aggressive tho???  

I mean you can't deny that it does happen in real life. I just put it as that guy as being a confused gay or just became bisexual when he fell in love with MC due to her characters. Unless you are telling me we are basing love from just the gender and you can't love another for their character, okay.

[
True but take in mind this is basing from the old times so it at least still match the plot or whatever plot left to savor.

Though honestly immunes to this and other shits. So did not much creeper me out XD

I just saw this forum, and I couldn't help but rant about MC's attitude. Like I know that if you love someone you should learn to let it go, but that does not mean you should ruin yourself for their happiness. Heroic? Yes but it's also stupid like if you just want him to divorce you why not pretend your death or that you gone mad? You could have done a lot of thing that does not involve you going around begging people to hate you. That's just such a petty way to get his attention. 

Really? Why should she doubt something without any evidence to doubt it? You mean someone should believe in something no matter the evidence to the contrary? They weren't acting in front of her which would be easier, if anything, to doubt. She caught them acting when they weren't aware of her. Who would put on an act when from an onlooker's perspective there's apparently no audience  Weird that you seem to think plays never have an audience. Ktbn.